1Rank
77Proxy
Enrollment
857
S:T Ratio
10.5:1
FRL %
0%
Proxy breakdown
Context
100
Resources
36
S:T
97
School IntelligenceTop 20 Public Elementary Schools
Context & Resources RankingNot SOL-based · NCES 2022
Top 20 Public Elementary Schools
Richmond Metro
Ranked by a proxy score: inverse of Free/Reduced Lunch %, district per-pupil spending, and student–teacher ratio. No Virginia SOL test data — use for context only.
Schools Ranked
20
by proxy score
Highest Proxy
77
Chesterfield Virtual School
Avg (Top 20)
66.7
Led by Chesterfield
Good to know
This ranking is based on context and resources, not test scores. Visit schools and confirm boundaries with the district. Boundaries can change; always verify assigned schools before making a decision.
2Rank
70Proxy
Enrollment
609
S:T Ratio
15.6:1
FRL %
3.8%
Proxy breakdown
Context
96
Resources
36
S:T
63
3Rank
67.6Proxy
Enrollment
591
S:T Ratio
16:1
FRL %
9.5%
Proxy breakdown
Context
91
Resources
38
S:T
60
4Rank
67.3Proxy
Enrollment
575
S:T Ratio
15.5:1
FRL %
11.5%
Proxy breakdown
Context
89
Resources
39
S:T
63
5Rank
67.3Proxy
Enrollment
607
S:T Ratio
14.1:1
FRL %
14.2%
Proxy breakdown
Context
86
Resources
39
S:T
73
6Rank
67.1Proxy
Enrollment
547
S:T Ratio
15.6:1
FRL %
11.3%
Proxy breakdown
Context
89
Resources
38
S:T
63
7Rank
66.9Proxy
Enrollment
493
S:T Ratio
14.9:1
FRL %
13%
Proxy breakdown
Context
87
Resources
38
S:T
67
8Rank
66.7Proxy
Enrollment
650
S:T Ratio
15.9:1
FRL %
11.5%
Proxy breakdown
Context
89
Resources
38
S:T
61
9Rank
66.7Proxy
Enrollment
778
S:T Ratio
16.2:1
FRL %
11.3%
Proxy breakdown
Context
89
Resources
39
S:T
59
10Rank
66.6Proxy
Enrollment
894
S:T Ratio
17.5:1
FRL %
6.8%
Proxy breakdown
Context
93
Resources
36
S:T
50
11Rank
66.5Proxy
Enrollment
804
S:T Ratio
16.8:1
FRL %
8.5%
Proxy breakdown
Context
92
Resources
36
S:T
55
12Rank
66.1Proxy
Enrollment
701
S:T Ratio
15.9:1
FRL %
13%
Proxy breakdown
Context
87
Resources
39
S:T
61
13Rank
65.8Proxy
Enrollment
748
S:T Ratio
18.2:1
FRL %
8.6%
Proxy breakdown
Context
91
Resources
38
S:T
45
14Rank
65.2Proxy
Enrollment
534
S:T Ratio
14.1:1
FRL %
18.5%
Proxy breakdown
Context
82
Resources
39
S:T
73
15Rank
65Proxy
Enrollment
429
S:T Ratio
8.6:1
FRL %
27.3%
Proxy breakdown
Context
73
Resources
39
S:T
100
16Rank
65Proxy
Enrollment
404
S:T Ratio
14.4:1
FRL %
18.3%
Proxy breakdown
Context
82
Resources
39
S:T
71
17Rank
64.3Proxy
Enrollment
997
S:T Ratio
17.2:1
FRL %
12%
Proxy breakdown
Context
88
Resources
36
S:T
52
18Rank
64.2Proxy
Enrollment
590
S:T Ratio
16.4:1
FRL %
15.4%
Proxy breakdown
Context
85
Resources
38
S:T
57
19Rank
64.2Proxy
Enrollment
748
S:T Ratio
16.6:1
FRL %
13.5%
Proxy breakdown
Context
87
Resources
36
S:T
56
20Rank
64.1Proxy
Enrollment
472
S:T Ratio
13.9:1
FRL %
25.8%
Proxy breakdown
Context
74
Resources
46
S:T
74
How the Proxy Score Is Calculated
This ranking is not based on Virginia SOL test results. It uses only NCES and district finance data: socioeconomic context (inverse of Free/Reduced Lunch %), per-pupil spending vs Virginia average, and student–teacher ratio.
Proxy = Context×0.50 + Resources×0.35 + S:T ratio×0.15
NCES: Urban Institute Education Data Portal, CY2022. Per-pupil: NCES F-33.Full School Dashboard